Anonymous
My feedback
12 results found
-
9 votes
Great idea, however it is almost an app in itself – it is significantly more complex than it sounds, but I’ll look into it.
-
40 votes
I have considered adding additional sounds – I’ll keep it in mind for a future update.
-
17 votes
I’ll see if I can add this, but that information is freely available online
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
-
8 votes
We are working on some design updates and I’ll see if we can integrate some of these ideas.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Unfortunately getting data this accurate is tricky, typically when you see this feature they may be using tricks like interpolation (averaging) between two 3 hour data points. I have been looking for a data source that can give this but it get both expensive and technical to implement.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
I’ll look into it if I get time
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
At the moment there is some complex logic for choosing the correct radar – I’ll look into tweaking it if there is a closer radar, even if that is of a lower quality image.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
I’m concerned with this behaviour as I have noticed it only serves to make the app seem more inaccurate – particularly when the storm is over 20 minutes away, as there can be several minutes of variation between each update. Using a relative time scale allows the app to fine tune the prediction without the penalty of being seen to be making such changes. Also having tested both I find a relative time scale more useful than the absolute time.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
I take it yo mean the force touch settings – that could be interesting, maybe once I get a new phone I’ll look into it.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
I’ll look into adding this if I have some time.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Thanks, I’ll look into it
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
